ضُعَفَاءُ الرُّواةِ بين الإِمَامَينِ الْنَّسائِيُ (ت 303هـ) والدَّارَقُطْنِيُّ (ت 385هـ) رحِمَهُمَا الله تعالى (أوجُهُ الإتِّفَاق والإختِلاف )

تَنَاوَلْتُ فِي هذا البحث  دِرَاسَة الْرُّوْاةُ الَّذِيْنَ ذكرهما الإمامين الْنَّسَائِيُّ و الدَّارَقُطْنِيُّ فِي كِتَابَيهِما الْضُّعَفَاءُ وَالْمَتْرُوْكِيْن فِي الْتَّرَجَمَةِ لَهُم، وَمَدَي اتِّفاَقِهِمَا وَاخْتِلَافِهِما فِي لَفْظِ الْجَرْحِ وَفِي مَرْتَبَةِ الْرَّاوِي وَأَثَرُ ذَلِك عَلَي دَرَجَةِ الْرَّاوِي ،وقسمت الْبَحْث إلى  مقدمة ، وتمهيد ، وثلاثة مَبَاحِث ، وَخَاتِمَة ،وفهارس  أما التمهيد  فقد اشتمل على الْتَّعْرِيْفُ بِالْإِمَامِ الْنَّسائِيُ  والْتَّعْرِيْفُ بِالْإِمَامِ الدَّارَقُطْنِيُّ ،  وَكِتَابَيهِما  الْضُّعَفَاءُ وَالْمَتْرُوْكِين ،والْتَّعْرِيْفُ بِالْفَاظِ الْجَرْحِ وَمَرَاتِبِهَا عِنْدَ الْنَّسائِيُ وَ الدَّارَقُطْنِيُّ. ويشتمل الْمَبْحَثُ الْأَوَّلُ : الْرُّوَاةُ الْمُتَفَق عَلَيْهِمُ فِي لَفْظِ الْجَرْحِ وَفِي الْمَرْتَبَةِ . والْمَبْحَثُ الْثَّانِي: الْرُّوَاةُ الْمُخْتَلَفِ عَلَيْهِم فِي لَفْظِ الْجَرْحِ وَاتُّفِقَ عَلَيْهِمُ فِي الْمَرْتَبَةِ . والْمَبْحَثُ الْثَّالِثُ: الْرُّوَاةُ الْمُخْتَلَفِ عَلَيْهِم فِي لَفْظِ الْجَرْحِ وَفِي الْمَرْتَبَةِ . وَيَشْتَمِلُ عَلَى مطلبين : الأول: الرواة المختلف عليهم في لفظ الجرح وفي المرتبة ولا يؤثر هذا الإختلاف علي درجة الراوي: والثاني: الرواة المختلف عليهم في لفظ الجرح وفي المرتبة وهذا الإختلاف يؤثر علي درجة الراوي: والْخَاتِمَةً: وفيها خُلَاصَةُ الْبَحْثِ وَنَتَائِجُهُ وأخيرا فهارس الْبَحْثِ .
Abstract: 
In this research, I studied the narrators mentioned by Imams Al-Nasa’i and Al-Daraqutni in their books Al-Du’fa’ and Al-Matrokoun in their translation, and the extent of their agreement They differed in the pronunciation of the wound and in the rank of the narrator, and this affected the level of the narrator. I divided the research into an introduction, a preface, three sections, a conclusion, and indexes. As for the preface, It included an introduction to Imam al-Nasa’i and Imam al-Daraqutni, and their two books, al-Du`fah and al-Mutrukun, and an introduction to the jarh and its ranks This is according to Al-Nasa’i and Al-Daraqutni. The first section includes: narrators who are agreed upon regarding the wording of the wound and its rank. The second topic: The narrators who differed over the wording of “jarh” and agreed upon in its rank. The third topic: The narrators who differed regarding the wording of the wound and its rank. It includes two requirements: The first: Narrators who are disputed in the wording of “jarh” and in rank, and this difference does not affect the grade of the narrator. The second: Narrators who are disputed in the wording of “jarh” and in rank, and this difference affects the grade of the narrator: And the conclusion: which contains the summary of the research, its results, and finally the research indexes. 
Keywords: Women's; Al-Daraqutni; Hurt Words; The Agreed Upon Narrators; Different Narrators; Rank.